Quantcast
Channel: All Network and Storage Protocols posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2151

Why doesn't SVM only communicate with DNS via port 636 ?

$
0
0

Hello community,

 

we have a problem that we are noticing now for the first time. We are currently using ONTAP 9.8P11 on FAS2750.

Our network administrators would like to use port 636 for communication with the DNS.

 

A newly created CIFS-SVM - so far without productive use - connects to DNS via port 636 (-use-ldaps-for-ad-ldap  is set o true / Root CA was createtd before) when it is accessed for the first time.

All further access - although we don't even know why this is happening (there are no accesses from CIFS clients yet!) - are again taking place via port 389? Why?

 

The parameters for the SVM are set as follows:

 

FAS27DX1::> vserver cifs security show -vserver SVM_xxxxx

 

Vserver: SVM_xxxxx

 

                            Kerberos Clock Skew:                   5 minutes

                            Kerberos Ticket Age:                  10 hours

                           Kerberos Renewal Age:                   7 days

                           Kerberos KDC Timeout:                   3 seconds

                            Is Signing Required:                true

                Is Password Complexity Required:                true

           Use start_tls for AD LDAP connection:               false

                      Is AES Encryption Enabled:               false

                         LM Compatibility Level:  lm-ntlm-ntlmv2-krb

                     Is SMB Encryption Required:               false

                        Client Session Security:                none

                SMB1 Enabled for DC Connections:               false

                SMB2 Enabled for DC Connections:      system-default

  LDAP Referral Enabled For AD LDAP connections:               false

               Use LDAPS for AD LDAP connection:                true

      Encryption is required for DC Connections:               false

 

FASxxxxx::>

 

Can anyone explain this behavior?

Why is only the first access via port 636 and the others via 389?

What is to be done so that only port 636 is used?

Why is there access to the DNS at all if the SVM is not yet productive? (our networkers have determined that this behavior probably occurs every 4 hours - See also graphic "ADROOT-LOG.jpg".).

 

I am grateful for any help.

 

Best regards

 

Michael

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2151

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images